Special Education Indicators Choose indicator for Local/Public Agency Compare Local/PA for this indicator

Local School System Results for Special Education
 
Allegany: Indicator 12 

Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

Place the mouse cursor over a data point below to view percent value or scroll down to see a table of results.

Results

2004/052005/062006/072007/082008/092009/102010/112011/122012/132013/142014/152015/162016/172017/182018/192019/202020/212021/22
State Baseline:6.21%-----------------
State Target:-100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100.0%100.0%100.0%100%100%100.00%100.00%100%100%
State Results:-83.60%95.29%95.54%97.28%99.73%99.17%99.89%99.31%99.74%99.41%99.69%99.86%100.00%
Target Met
99.95%99.77%98.81%98.75%
State Total# of Students:-
State Indicator Measurement:-
Allegany Results:-100.00%
Target Met
100.00%
Target Met
100.00%
Target Met
100.00%
Target Met
100%
Target Met
100.00%
Target Met
100.00%
Target Met
-100.00%
Target Met
100.00%
Target Met
100.00%
Target Met
-100.00%
Target Met
100.00%
Target Met
100.00%
Target Met
-100.00%
Target Met
Allegany Total# of Students:---
Allegany Indicator Measurement:---


Narrative Description of Indicator

Indicator 12:  Early Childhood Transition
 
Local education agencies and public agencies reported 98.75% (1,815 of 1,838) of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who were found eligible for Part B, had an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.   
The MSDE, DEI/SES identified twenty-three (23) students with "unacceptable reasons for delays." The unacceptable reason for each student's delay was identified as paperwork errors, administrative errors, and staffing.

The range of delays were:

  • 1 to 15 Days = 4 students
  • 16 to 30 Days = 3 students
  • 31 to 45 Days = 5 student
  • Beyond 45 Days = 11 students

This information is used by the MSDE Monitoring Staff to assist local education agencies and public agencies in analyzing data and in providing technical assistance. The MSDE data management and program staff worked closely with local education agencies’ staff to ensure the integrity of the data reported in FFY 2021.






2020-2021 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2019-2020 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2018-2019 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2017-2018 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2016-2017 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2015-2016 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2014-2015 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2013-2014 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2012-2013 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2011-2012 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2010-2011 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2009-2010 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2008-2009 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2007-2008 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2006-2007 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12
2005-2006 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 12