Local School System Results for Special Education Prince George's: Indicator 9
Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Narrative Description of Indicator
Indicator 9: Disproportionate Representation The State will use its 618 data, collected the last Friday in October, 2021, from each of the 25 local education agencies, and reported in the Maryland Early Intervention/Special Education Services Census Data and Related Tables. Definition of “Disproportionate Representation” and Methodology Disproportionality is defined as having students in a particular racial/ethnic group (i.e., American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian, African American, White, Hispanic, Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or 2 or more races), being at a considerably greater or lesser risk of being identified as eligible for special education and related services than all other racial/ethnic groups enrolled either in the local education agency (LEA) or in the State. For consistency and clarity, the MSDE's Indicator 9 methodology is similar to the methodology used for identifying Significant Disproportionality. In addition to meeting the 2.0 or greater risk ratio, the LEA must meet the criteria for the minimum cell size and n-size, where cell size is the number of students in an LEA who are a specific race/ethnicity and identified with a specific disability category, and where the n-size is the number of students with disabilities of a specific race/ethnicity enrolled in an LEA. The MSDE utilizes a minimum cell size of five (5) and a minimum “n” size of twenty (20). Unlike the calculation for Significant Disproportionality, the State only examines one (1) year of data in the calculation and does not consider reasonable progress for Indicator 9. As such, disproportionate representation is identified for any LEA with a risk ratio of 2.0 for one (1) year of data or greater who meets the minimum cell size and n-size requirements. Identification of Disproportionality MSDE's analysis of the data for the 2022-2023 performance period demonstrated that zero (0) LEAs were identified as having a disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups. No LEAs were excluded from the calculation. Compare Local School Systems for Indicator 9.
2021-2022 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92020-2021 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92019-2020 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92018-2019 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92017-2018 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92016-2017 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92015-2016 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92014-2015 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92013-2014 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92012-2013 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92011-2012 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92010-2011 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92009-2010 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92008-2009 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92007-2008 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 92006-2007 Archive: Special Education - Indicator 9