Early Intervention Services Indicators Choose indicator for Local/Public Agency Compare Local/PA for this indicator

Local Infants and Toddlers Program Results for Early Intervention Services
 
Baltimore County: Indicator 5 

Percent of infants and toddlers birth to 1 with IFSPs compared to national data.

Place the mouse cursor over a data point below to view percent value or scroll down to see a table of results.

Results

2004/052005/062006/072007/082008/092009/102010/112011/122012/132013/142014/152015/162016/17
State Baseline:1.22%------------
State Target:-1.33%1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5%1.51%1.52%1.53%
State Results:-1.24%1.34%1.25%1.33%1.47%1.59%
Target Met
1.48%1.55%
Target Met
1.68%
Target Met
1.53%
Target Met
1.61%
Target Met
1.59%
Target Met
State Total# of Children:-764937649378060753627651171523730597197673267732847290772580
State Indicator Measurement:-951951979100511261134108311131232111911761155
Baltimore County Results:-1.12%1.23%1.24%1.04%1.55%
Target Met
1.51%
Target Met
1.71%
Target Met
1.43%1.69%
Target Met
1.51%
Target Met
1.63%
Target Met
1.43%
Baltimore County Total# of Children:-925994099873954698229467971196139833968097559827
Baltimore County Indicator Measurement:-10411612299152143166137166146159141


Narrative Description of Indicator

Based on data provided by OSEP on www.ideadata.org, the 24 LITPs provided early intervention services to 1.59% of the Maryland 2016 resident birth to one-year-old population.  The percentage of children birth-to one-year of age receiving early intervention services in Maryland decreased slightly from 1.62% in FFY 2015 to 1.59% in FFY 2016.  Compared to national data, Maryland provided early intervention services to 0.35% more children birth to one year of age than the national baseline of 1.24% and ranked 13th among the 50 States and U.S. territories.
 
Fourteen of the 24 LITPs met the State target for the percentage of birth to one year old children receiving early intervention services.  Efforts were made throughout the State to increase public awareness of the program, especially with primary health care providers, in an attempt to increase the number of referrals from both parents and providers.  If the State target was not met, LITPs were required to develop and implement improvement plan strategies and, as necessary, received technical assistance from MSDE.